Open V’s Closed Environments

I continue to use and like Moodle, even though I find I am constantly being challenged to rethink my stand point.

Recently Graham Wegner was one of those making me validate my stand point.

Usually when those who are progressive in adopting new technologies question Moodle it is in regard to the system being closed. Comparisons are made to blogs and wikis that are open for the whole world to view and share.

This is a valid point, the openness of blogs and wikis is a very powerful feature, helping one grow/develop and explore new ideas. As someone who tries to keep up with the blogosphere I do not dispute this usefulness. However I believe the closed system has its place.

A closed system obviously lacks the depth of user input. The opportunity to interact with experts can be missed and certain viewpoints will influence the learner. However this system also has its advantages.

During the learning experience a student’s viewpoints and understandings change. What one believes at the beginning of the journey will more often than not be different to what they believe at the end of the journey. Further students will feel more comfortable exploring an idea in a closed environment.

In a world where employers now “Google” potential employees names before employing them what impact will this have on their futures?

I believe that a combination of the use of these technologies is the answer. Each technology could be used for specific purpose, with students being aware that material published to the web is in the public forum.

Students can then explore new ideas in a safe environment and when they are ready to share their thought with the world they can do so.